In this
futuristic tale David, a cybetronic “mecha”, is abandoned by his mother and
hopes to win back her affection by becoming a real boy. David’s ability to love
appears unquestionable when watching the movie. His unending love for his
mother is the vehicle through which the entire story takes place. A central
question in the story, though, is not whether David can love, but whether David
can truly be loved as a mecha. Although initially skeptical of keeping David,
his mother Monica warms to him and programs him to view her as his mother which
triggers his unending love for her. As Dr. Hobby postulated when he said, “Didn’t
God create Adam to love him?”, soon after David’s programming, Monica begins to
reciprocate her motherly love back. Her love for David was clear and distinct
from how he’s treated throughout the rest of the film because Monica, while
aware David is a mecha, still makes no distinction in how she treats him
compared to a “real” boy. For example her continually referring to him as “just
a boy” and beginning to treat him as if he was a newly adopted son is starkly
in contrast to how any other human will treat David once aware he’s a mecha.
In general,
most viewed David as an unbelievable Science Project to be marveled at with no
recognition of David himself. He’s never treated as just a boy once his true
identity is revealed, as made evident by the pool scene. Even the childlike
naivety wasn’t enough to allow for the children to view David as David upon learning
he was a mecha, instead he is immediately put under the figurative microscope
to be dissected by the children. Even his own creator, after seeing the
undeniable success his creation was, is far more interested with the
intricacies of how the circuits work than David himself; meaning in this case
God created Adam to love him, but did not love Adam back himself.
A
question this all beckons, though, is what is love and is it distinctly human?
A great scene in the movie is when one of the mechas is asked to describe what
love is. She gives a very quantitative description of love that amuses Hobby and the other scientists. But in reality can any of us truly define what
love is in words? Whether love is viewed scientifically or mystically, the sensation
we all ascribe to it is beyond comprehension in words alone. In science, as we
discussed in class, the mechanism of love that David
has boils down to electrical impulses through circuitry, which is analogous to
humans. Not only this, even our maternal imprinting functions similar to the
codes Monica entered into David, upon his birth as her son, making the
scientific definition not a true distinction at all. As far as the religious definition,
as a Hindu I believe in the Aatman, or God, within all of us, and it is thought
that the indescribable feeling that we ascribe to Love is a subtle connection
of the Aatmans of two people that make them interconnected. In this sense, too,
David clearly displays love towards Monica and vice versa; when things got bad,
Monica recognized David as more than a mecha and believed the entity within him
was worth saving.
Although
Monica was able to love David, she was the only one. If the Aatman was a lamp
that was covered by dust, only Monica’s light would be able penetrate the dust
to gleen through her preconceived notions of what’s real.
While I completely agree that Monica was able to show more love to David than any other human he encounters, I don't think that she necessarily loved him back. She definitely did not completely reciprocate the feelings he had for her. His entire existence centered around his love for her, whereas he was only in her life for a short while. It is never indicated that she made any effort to find him later in her life, whereas he spent every waking moments trying to become a "real boy" so she could love him in return.
ReplyDeleteI entirely agree with ^this guy right here. Monica definitely used David as a machine, for the purpose he was created: to act as a substitute for Martin. When she learned that Martin would return, Monica was unable to keep an open eye for both children because she was focusing on her "real" child, and offering Martin more of her time, than she did David. I believe this is because she felt that he was not as deserving of her love as Martin was, or at least her time as a mother. for this reason she could not prevent David from comiting his regretable actions and therefore did not show him the loved he deserved. For this reason she did not replicate Davids love and showed that David was merely a machine to her.
ReplyDelete