In Fritz
Lang’s futuristic film Metropolis the relationships that shape society are
examined. Metropolis is set in a future society where the population is divided
into two groups, the workers and the thinkers. Both groups, though, are
oblivious of the existence of the other and go about their daily lives as such;
the thinkers live a life of luxury, while the workers live a life of indentured
servitude. Joh Frederson, the architect of metropolis, is aware of the
existence of the workers, and works tirelessly to ensure that others,
especially his son Freder, do not know.
Both
societies exist dependent upon the other; therefore Joh attempts to maintain a
social equilibrium between the thinkers and workers in order to maintain the
status quo. An interesting parallel I drew while watching Metropolis was that
to the story of the Buddha that I recently learned about in World Religions. In
the same manner that the Buddha was sheltered by his father in order to shield
him from the other side of the utopic bubble he resided, so to does Joh attempt
to shield Freder from the existence of the workers. Once aware, both become
inspired and moved, and in this way Freder is the heart that connects the brain
to the hands. The idea of ascension for the Buddha or Freder descending to the
depths both describe the coming of a conduit for the unintelligent masses
attempting to enlighten them to their current situation.
In the end,
though, the masses never become enlightened and eventually return to toil in
the depths. Their initial desire to move up and leave their roles as workers is
eventually subdued. Although not his initial purpose, Freder, unintentionally,
restores the social equilibrium his father had set up by becoming the mediator
between the brain (thinkers) and hands (workers) and restoring peace to the
interdependent parts. Similar to the architects of today’s society, Joh
attempted to skew the intentions of the faith leader of the workers, Maria. In
the end, Joh’s attempt to abuse the faith of the masses leads to the workers
affirmation of their role in society, as evidenced by the final handshake
between Joh and the worker.
With this
in mind, the message of Metropolis has become clearer with the passage of time
due to the added relevance it has today. Metropolis doesn’t end with the
working class rising and gaining equality, rather they return to the depths and
their initial role with a false sense of accomplishment. Similarly, in modern
society fluidity between classes has become less and less achievable, while the
masses continue to put faith in those sent to deceive them as many would say is
the case in American politics today. And this is all done with instruction from
the architects of society to maintain the present society; just as Joh
attempted to maintain the social order within Metropolis.
I admire the religious connections you found within Metropolis. I always find religious connections intriguing; however, I only seem to find them within Christianity because that's what I've grown up with. In Metropolis, I found a religious connection with Maria as the symbol of the Virgin Mary, whereas the machine Maria could be seen as the opposite of innocence; a kind of anti-Christ. Additionally, in reference to your comments on the class separation, I think a lot could be said about Metropolis in comparison with capitalism. In capitalism, there are the people who have the great ideas, and then the people who work for those people with great ideas. I think it's important that we not forget that what we have would not be possible without the hard work of the workers because the thinkers would be nothing without them.
ReplyDelete